Bip Milwaukee Local News

collapse
Home / Daily News Analysis / Tarot card readers are using ChatGPT for divinations, I am utterly surprised at this AI pivot

Tarot card readers are using ChatGPT for divinations, I am utterly surprised at this AI pivot

May 15, 2026  Twila Rosenbaum  13 views
Tarot card readers are using ChatGPT for divinations, I am utterly surprised at this AI pivot

Artificial intelligence has already permeated some of the most intimate and emotionally charged corners of human existence. From AI-generated eulogies to chatbots that simulate conversations with deceased loved ones, the technology is being invited into spaces once reserved for raw human empathy. Now, a 2026 study has revealed that tarot card readers—practitioners of an ancient divinatory art—are incorporating AI into their readings. The finding lands far outside the typical narrative of AI as a productivity tool and raises pressing questions about the role of technology in personal and spiritual decision-making.

The study, conducted by researchers specializing in human-computer interaction, surveyed and interviewed dozens of tarot practitioners across online communities. It found that many readers are turning to ChatGPT—OpenAI's large language model—for assistance when interpreting card spreads. The practice is still emerging, but its existence signals a broader cultural shift: people are not just asking AI to organize their schedules; they are asking it to help them make sense of their lives.

The Allure of AI in a World of Ambiguity

Tarot readings operate on a foundation of symbolism and ambiguity. A single card can carry multiple meanings depending on its position, the surrounding cards, and the querent's personal circumstances. Traditionally, the reader's skill lies in holding that ambiguity open, allowing the querent to explore their own feelings and insights. But interpretation is slow and mentally demanding. When a spread is especially complex or the cards seem to point in contradictory directions, the desire for a quick, coherent answer becomes powerful.

Enter ChatGPT. The chatbot can take a jumble of clashing symbols—the Tower, the Three of Swords, the Ace of Cups—and return a narrative that feels complete and authoritative. It smooths over contradictions with confident prose. For a reader stuck in a muddle, that clarity is seductive. The study identified two broad patterns among practitioners: some used AI as a shortcut when a spread felt difficult to untangle, while others used it more deliberately to challenge their own interpretations and surface blind spots.

The Problem with AI's Certainty

The uneasy part of this technological handoff lies in the fundamental difference between how tarot works and how AI works. Tarot asks people to sit with uncertainty, to reflect on what a card might mean in the context of their own story. ChatGPT, on the other hand, is engineered to reduce ambiguity. It takes messy, open-ended input and produces a confident, linear response. This is a feature in many applications—technical support, data summarization, creative writing—but in tarot, it can be a bug.

When a reading becomes too clean, it loses something essential. The power of tarot often comes from the tension between possible meanings, from the moment when a querent realizes that the answer to their question is not in the cards but in their own reaction to them. ChatGPT does not know the emotional history behind the question. It has no sense of the personal stakes involved. Its confidence can be misleading, offering a false sense of closure that short-circuits genuine self-reflection.

The study's authors caution that over-reliance on AI could erode the very skills that make tarot valuable: intuition, empathy, and the ability to sit with not-knowing. One practitioner quoted in the study described using ChatGPT to "clean up" a reading and later realizing that the most important insight came from the parts of the spread that resisted interpretation.

A More Responsible Use: AI as a Mirror

Not all uses of AI in tarot are problematic. The study also documented a more careful and deliberate approach. Some readers used ChatGPT to compare their interpretations with an alternative reading, to test whether their own biases were influencing their analysis, or to explore angles they had not considered. In these cases, the AI was not the final authority but a dialogue partner—a tool for expanding the interpretive space rather than closing it down.

One participant described asking ChatGPT to play devil's advocate: "If I'm seeing a positive outcome, I ask the bot to give me the most pessimistic interpretation of the same spread. It forces me to think about vulnerabilities I might be glossing over." This use aligns with a broader trend of using AI to surface blind spots in decision-making. The key difference is that the human remains in control, weighing the AI's contribution against their own knowledge and intuition.

Beyond Tarot: AI in Grief, Faith, and Memory

The tarot trend is not an isolated phenomenon. It belongs to a wider movement of people turning to AI for emotional and spiritual support. Companies now offer AI companions for the grieving, chatbots that simulate religious figures, and apps that generate personalized prayers or affirmations. These technologies fill a void left by the decline of traditional community-based support systems, but they also raise serious ethical concerns.

The same dynamic that makes ChatGPT problematic for tarot applies to these other domains. AI can provide comfort in moments of loneliness, but it can also give answers that feel right without being right. A chatbot might tell a grieving person exactly what they want to hear, reinforcing denial rather than facilitating healing. A faith-based AI might offer a prayer that feels authentic, but it cannot understand the theological nuances of a personal crisis. The line between helpful and harmful can be razor-thin.

Researchers studying AI in emotionally sensitive contexts emphasize the importance of transparency. Users need to know when they are interacting with a statistical model rather than a sentient being. They need to understand that the AI's confidence is not an indicator of truth. And they need to retain the final say in how the information is used.

The Historical Context of Tarot and Technology

Tarot has always adapted to the tools available to its practitioners. The cards themselves originated as playing cards in 15th-century Europe, later evolving into a divinatory system in the 18th century. In the 20th century, the rise of mass-market decks and the internet transformed how people accessed and shared readings. Online forums, YouTube tutorials, and mobile apps made tarot more accessible than ever. The leap to AI is a natural progression—a technology that promises speed, depth, and personalized insight.

But tarot's history is also a history of resistance to mechanization. The ritual of shuffling and laying out cards, the tactile connection to a physical object, the presence of a human reader—these elements are part of the practice's appeal. Whether an AI can replicate that experience meaningfully is an open question. Some practitioners argue that the machine's lack of embodied awareness makes it inherently incapable of true divination. Others see it as a new tool, no different from a card deck or a book of meanings.

Practical Guidance for the AI-Assisted Reader

For tarot practitioners who choose to integrate AI into their practice, the study offers some practical guidelines. The first is to maintain awareness of the tool's limitations. ChatGPT is a language model trained on vast amounts of text; it can recognize patterns and generate plausible narratives, but it has no inherent understanding of symbols or human experience. Its outputs should be treated as one possible interpretation among many, not as the definitive answer.

The second guideline is to use AI to expand rather than contract the reading. If the bot offers a smooth narrative, ask what the alternative narratives might be. If it provides a comfortable answer, ask what it might be ignoring. The goal is not to find the single correct meaning but to open up layers of meaning that might otherwise remain hidden.

Third, practitioners should remain the final authority. The study's most successful examples of AI use were those where the reader stayed in control of the interpretive process. The bot provided raw material, but the human wove it into a reading that respected the querent's context and emotional state. This distinction reaches far beyond tarot. As AI creeps into grief, faith, advice, and memory, the practical rule is simple: let the technology widen the question before you let it close one.


Source: Digital Trends News


Share:

Your experience on this site will be improved by allowing cookies Cookie Policy